Customer centricity: the new Copernican revolution
We are in the midst of a Copernican Revolution; businesses that revolve around their customers are outperforming and outlasting those brands that believe their customers ought to revolve around them. The Copernican Revolution of the 21st century is that of Customer Centricity. To become a more customer-centric organization, there are three core ingredients to consider: …. The digital age is moving at an ever-increasing pace. This manifests itself not only in the speed of new technological innovations but also in consumer expectations.
Companies like Apple, Tesla and Tencent are setting the standards for what consumers expect from all brands.
A Survival Imperative for Space Colonization - The New York Times
Do you think your company is consumer-centered? Think again. Many companies have different practices in place for defining and delivering great consumer experiences, like voice of the customer programs, co-creation, journey mapping, etc. But the question is: do they make a difference? Is this impacting the loyalty of your customers and does this make you …. Many will agree that engagement and connectivity within the organization are key for a future-proof company. This was again made clear a week ago at the Marketing Momentum in Schelle: a congrestival on marketing, digital transformation, e-commerce and much more.
After attending several sessions set up by both technology and service providers, this message was …. Millions of personal interactions and transactions are made on the web every single second and minute. The fact is, Data never sleeps. One way of looking at that is to say the web is still a ….
In plenty a company, customer service is the only tangible contact or touchpoint a customer has with a company. A lot of customers spend an awful lot of money hundreds or even thousands of euros a year with a company. On top of that, for a lot of companies, customer service is their only differentiator …. Back to BLOG. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Induver future-proofs business with digital transformation strategy Induver, a Belgian B2B insurance broker with a focus on medium-sized enterprises, wanted to prepare its team for a digital transformation process imperative for the industry.
Ingredients of Customer Centricity: Extreme Creativity Customer Experience determines not only whether a brand survives, it determines if it thrives. Ingredients of customer centricity: Extreme Speed Customer centricity requires brand owners to step outside the boundaries of their business and look at their value proposition through the eyes of their consumers. Ingredients of customer centricity: Extreme Customer Obsession We are in the midst of a Copernican Revolution; businesses that revolve around their customers are outperforming and outlasting those brands that believe their customers ought to revolve around them.
How we keep on aiming for the sky with our SkyPriority research app The digital age is moving at an ever-increasing pace. Since objects can only be experienced spatiotemporally, the only application of concepts that yields knowledge is to the empirical, spatiotemporal world.
- Seminaire dAlgebre Paul Dubreil et Marie-Paule Malliavin!
- A Survival Imperative for Space Colonization?
Beyond that realm, there can be no sensations of objects for the understanding to judge, rightly or wrongly. Since intuitions of the physical world are lacking when we speculate about what lies beyond, metaphysical knowledge, or knowledge of the world outside the physical, is impossible. Claiming to have knowledge from the application of concepts beyond the bounds of sensation results in the empty and illusory transcendent metaphysics of Rationalism that Kant reacts against.
It should be pointed out, however, that Kant is not endorsing an idealism about objects like Berkeley's. That is, Kant does not believe that material objects are unknowable or impossible. While Kant is a transcendental idealist--he believes the nature of objects as they are in themselves is unknowable to us--knowledge of appearances is nevertheless possible. As noted above, in The Refutation of Material Idealism , Kant argues that the ordinary self-consciousness that Berkeley and Descartes would grant implies "the existence of objects in space outside me.
Another way to put the point is to say that the fact that the mind of the knower makes the a priori contribution does not mean that space and time or the categories are mere figments of the imagination. Kant is an empirical realist about the world we experience; we can know objects as they appear to us. He gives a robust defense of science and the study of the natural world from his argument about the mind's role in making nature.
- Collapse Volume V.
- The Everything Creative Writing Book: All You Need to Know to Write Novels, Plays, Short Stories, Screenplays, Poems, Articles, Or Blogs!
- Free on-line course to demonstrate satellites’ role in monitoring oceans’ health;
- Engineering Chemistry.
All discursive, rational beings must conceive of the physical world as spatially and temporally unified, he argues. And the table of categories is derived from the most basic, universal forms of logical inference, Kant believes. Therefore, it must be shared by all rational beings. So those beings also share judgments of an intersubjective, unified, public realm of empirical objects. Hence, objective knowledge of the scientific or natural world is possible. Indeed, Kant believes that the examples of Newton and Galileo show it is actual. So Berkeley's claims that we do not know objects outside of us and that such knowledge is impossible are both mistaken.
In conjunction with his analysis of the possibility of knowing empirical objects, Kant gives an analysis of the knowing subject that has sometimes been called his transcendental psychology. Much of Kant's argument can be seen as subjective, not because of variations from mind to mind, but because the source of necessity and universality is in the mind of the knowing subject, not in objects themselves.
Kant draws several conclusions about what is necessarily true of any consciousness that employs the faculties of sensibility and understanding to produce empirical judgments. As we have seen, a mind that employs concepts must have a receptive faculty that provides the content of judgments. Space and time are the necessary forms of apprehension for the receptive faculty. The mind that has experience must also have a faculty of combination or synthesis , the imagination for Kant, that apprehends the data of sense, reproduces it for the understanding, and recognizes their features according to the conceptual framework provided by the categories.
The mind must also have a faculty of understanding that provides empirical concepts and the categories for judgment. The various faculties that make judgment possible must be unified into one mind. And it must be identical over time if it is going to apply its concepts to objects over time. Kant here addresses Hume's famous assertion that introspection reveals nothing more than a bundle of sensations that we group together and call the self. Judgments would not be possible, Kant maintains, if the mind that senses is not the same as the mind that possesses the forms of sensibility.
And that mind must be the same as the mind that employs the table of categories, that contributes empirical concepts to judgment, and that synthesizes the whole into knowledge of a unified, empirical world. So the fact that we can empirically judge proves, contra Hume, that the mind cannot be a mere bundle of disparate introspected sensations. In his works on ethics Kant will also argue that this mind is the source of spontaneous, free, and moral action. Kant believes that all the threads of his transcendental philosophy come together in this "highest point" which he calls the transcendental unity of apperception.
We have seen the progressive stages of Kant's analysis of the faculties of the mind which reveals the transcendental structuring of experience performed by these faculties. First, in his analysis of sensibility , he argues for the necessarily spatiotemporal character of sensation. Then Kant analyzes the understanding , the faculty that applies concepts to sensory experience. He concludes that the categories provide a necessary, foundational template for our concepts to map onto our experience.
In addition to providing these transcendental concepts, the understanding also is the source of ordinary empirical concepts that make judgments about objects possible. The understanding provides concepts as the rules for identifying the properties in our representations. Kant's next concern is with the faculty of judgment, "If understanding as such is explicated as our power of rules, then the power of judgment is the ability to subsume under rules, i.
The next stage in Kant's project will be to analyze the formal or transcendental features of experience that enable judgment, if there are any such features besides what the previous stages have identified. The cognitive power of judgment does have a transcendental structure. Kant argues that there are a number of principles that must necessarily be true of experience in order for judgment to be possible.
Kant's analysis of judgment and the arguments for these principles are contained in his Analytic of Principles. Within the Analytic, Kant first addresses the challenge of subsuming particular sensations under general categories in the Schematism section.
Transcendental schemata , Kant argues, allow us to identify the homogeneous features picked out by concepts from the heterogeneous content of our sensations. Judgment is only possible if the mind can recognize the components in the diverse and disorganized data of sense that make those sensations an instance of a concept or concepts. A schema makes it possible, for instance, to subsume the concrete and particular sensations of an Airedale, a Chihuahua, and a Labrador all under the more abstract concept "dog. The full extent of Kant's Copernican revolution becomes even more clear in the rest of the Analytic of Principles.
That is, the role of the mind in making nature is not limited to space, time, and the categories. In the Analytic of Principles, Kant argues that even the necessary conformity of objects to natural law arises from the mind. Thus far, Kant's transcendental method has permitted him to reveal the a priori components of sensations, the a priori concepts.
2. Extreme speed
In the sections titled the Axioms, Anticipations, Analogies, and Postulates, he argues that there are a priori judgments that must necessarily govern all appearances of objects. These judgments are a function of the table of categories' role in determining all possible judgments, so the four sections map onto the four headings of that table.
I include all of the a priori judgments, or principles, here to illustrate the earlier claims about Kant's empirical realism, and to show the intimate relationship Kant saw between his project and that of the natural sciences:. The discussion of Kant's metaphysics and epistemology so far including the Analytic of Principles has been confined primarily to the section of the Critique of Pure Reason that Kant calls the Transcendental Analytic. The purpose of the Analytic, we are told, is "the rarely attempted dissection of the power of the understanding itself.
Kant's project has been to develop the full argument for his theory about the mind's contribution to knowledge of the world. Once that theory is in place, we are in a position to see the errors that are caused by transgressions of the boundaries to knowledge established by Kant's transcendental idealism and empirical realism. Kant calls judgments that pretend to have knowledge beyond these boundaries and that even require us to tear down the limits that he has placed on knowledge, transcendent judgments.
The Transcendental Dialectic section of the book is devoted to uncovering the illusion of knowledge created by transcendent judgments and explaining why the temptation to believe them persists. Kant argues that the proper functioning of the faculties of sensibility and the understanding combine to draw reason, or the cognitive power of inference, inexorably into mistakes.
The faculty of reason naturally seeks the highest ground of unconditional unity. It seeks to unify and subsume all particular experiences under higher and higher principles of knowledge. But sensibility cannot by its nature provide the intuitions that would make knowledge of the highest principles and of things as they are in themselves possible.
Nevertheless, reason, in its function as the faculty of inference, inevitably draws conclusions about what lies beyond the boundaries of sensibility. The unfolding of this conflict between the faculties reveals more about the mind's relationship to the world it seeks to know and the possibility of a science of metaphysics. Kant believes that Aristotle's logic of the syllogism captures the logic employed by reason.
The resulting mistakes from the inevitable conflict between sensibility and reason reflect the logic of Aristotle's syllogism. Corresponding to the three basic kinds of syllogism are three dialectic mistakes or illusions of transcendent knowledge that cannot be real.